A collection account comes off a credit report in one of five ways: a bureau deletes it after a dispute under FCRA Section 611 because the collector cannot verify it, the collector agrees in writing to delete it in exchange for payment, a bureau blocks it under FCRA Section 605B because it came from identity theft, the bureaus’ own medical-debt policy excludes it, or it ages out about seven and a half years after the delinquency that produced it. An FDCPA validation request belongs on the list as a tool, since it stops collection until the collector verifies, but it does not by itself take anything off a report.

The problem is bigger than one account. The Urban Institute’s Debt in America analysis of August 2025 credit-bureau data found 35% of adults with a credit file, about 77 million people, carrying debt in collections, at a median of $1,349. And the data behind those tradelines travels badly. The Federal Trade Commission’s 2013 study of the debt buying industry, covering nine of the largest buyers and nearly 90 million accounts, found buyers paid an average of about 4 cents per dollar of face value, did not receive whether the consumer had previously disputed the debt, and bought under contracts in which the creditor did not warrant that the account information was accurate. A debt that has changed hands twice is carrying a file nobody vouched for.

That is also the limit. A collection that is accurate, complete, verifiable and inside its reporting window stays, and no letter changes that. The FTC’s congressionally mandated national accuracy study found one in five consumers had an error on at least one of their three credit reports, which is a reason to check every field and no reason to assume a given collection is wrong. The route that works depends on what is actually wrong with the account.

The five routes, and the fact each one needs

RouteWorks whenLegal basisWhat you send
Bureau disputeA field is inaccurate or incomplete, or the collector cannot verify itFCRA Section 611, 15 U.S.C. 1681iA dispute to each bureau reporting it, with documents
Identity theft blockThe account was opened or used by someone elseFCRA Section 605B, 15 U.S.C. 1681c-2Proof of identity, an identity theft report, the items, and your statement
Pay-for-delete or deletion clauseThe debt is yours and the collector agrees to deleteContract only; no statute requires itA written agreement, signed before any payment
Medical-debt policyThe collection is medical and paid, under $500, or reported before its first yearThe bureaus’ 2022 and 2023 voluntary changesA bureau dispute citing the policy and your proof of payment
Aging outThe reporting window has runFCRA Section 605(c)(1), 15 U.S.C. 1681c(c)(1)Nothing, or a dispute if it outstays the window

Goodwill requests and FDCPA validation letters sit beside these routes. A goodwill letter asks for a favor nobody owes. A validation letter makes the collector stop collecting until it verifies the debt, and what it cannot verify becomes the ground for the bureau dispute.

Pull all three reports and check five fields on every collection

Every route starts with the reports. The FCRA gives every consumer the right to a free report from each nationwide bureau, available at AnnualCreditReport.com, and FCRA Section 609(a)(1) and (a)(2) obliges a bureau, on request, to disclose everything in the file and the sources of that information. Pull Equifax, Experian and TransUnion together, because each keeps its own file and the same collection can read differently at each one.

Then look for errors field by field. These are the five that decide which route is open:

FieldWhat to compare it againstWhat a mismatch means
Original creditorYour own statements and letters from the lenderA missing or wrong original creditor is an incomplete item
BalanceThe last statement plus any interest or fees the original agreement allowsFDCPA Section 808(1) bars collecting any amount not authorized by the agreement or by law
Date of first delinquencyThe first missed payment that led to the charge-offA later date shortens nothing and extends the reporting window; it is re-aging
Status and payment historyReceipts, settlement letters, bank recordsA paid or settled account still showing unpaid is inaccurate
DuplicatesThe original creditor’s charge-off line and every collector’s lineThe same debt reported as two open balances by two collectors

A charge-off from the original lender and a collection from the agency that later took the account can both appear legitimately; our guide to what a charge-off is and how to remove it covers that pairing. Two collectors both reporting a balance on one debt is a different matter.

FCRA Section 611 makes a bureau delete what a collector cannot verify

A dispute under FCRA Section 611 is filed with each bureau that reports the collection, one collection at a time, naming the specific field that is wrong and attaching the documents that show it. Grounds that apply to collections include a wrong balance, a wrong date of first delinquency, a missing or wrong original creditor, a duplicate listing of the same debt, and a paid account still reported as unpaid.

The statute sets the sequence:

  1. Within 5 business days, Section 611(a)(2) requires the bureau to notify the furnisher and pass on all relevant information it received from you.
  2. The bureau must complete a reasonable reinvestigation within 30 days under Section 611(a)(1), extendable by up to 15 days if you send relevant information during that window.
  3. Under Section 611(a)(5)(A), an item found inaccurate or incomplete, or one that cannot be verified, must be promptly deleted or modified.
  4. The results notice under Section 611(a)(6)(B) includes a revised report, and you may request a description of the procedure used, including the furnisher’s name and address, which the bureau must supply within 15 days under Section 611(a)(7).
  5. A deleted item may be put back only if the furnisher certifies it is complete and accurate, and Section 611(a)(5)(B) requires the bureau to tell you in writing within 5 business days of any reinsertion.

Two limits apply. Section 611(a)(3) lets a bureau end a reinvestigation it reasonably finds frivolous, including a dispute sent with no supporting information, so a bare “not mine” with nothing attached invites that response. And you can also dispute directly with the collector under FCRA Section 623(a)(8), which requires the furnisher to investigate and report the result on the same 30-day clock. Our walkthrough of what happens after you dispute a credit report error follows each step.

When the three bureaus disagree about one collection, the inconsistency is the dispute

When the same collection reads differently at Equifax, Experian and TransUnion, the difference is itself a dispute ground. A collection that shows a date of first delinquency of February 2022 at Experian and August 2021 at TransUnion cannot be accurate at both, and you can dispute the later date with the pre-collection statements that show when the account actually went delinquent. Differences arise from separate data feeds from one furnisher, from one bureau processing a prior dispute that another did not, and from stale records that missed a later correction.

A dispute that succeeds at one bureau does not travel to the other two. Section 611 binds each bureau separately: a collector that fails to verify at one bureau within its window has that item deleted there under Section 611(a)(5)(A), even while another bureau keeps it. After any deletion or correction, pull all three reports again and file matching disputes wherever the item remains, citing the result you already have.

Balances work the same way. A collection showing $1,250 at one bureau and $1,400 at another, with no interest or fee the original agreement authorizes to explain the gap, is wrong at one of them at least. Dispute both reported balances and let each bureau put the collector to its records. If the same debt appears twice on a single report, our guide to why the same debt can be on your credit report twice sorts legitimate pairs from duplicates.

An FDCPA Section 1692g validation request stops collection, and reporting runs through the bureau

Under FDCPA Section 809 (15 U.S.C. 1692g), a collector must send a written notice within five days of its first communication with you, stating the amount of the debt, the creditor it is owed to, and your right to dispute it. If you dispute in writing within thirty days of receiving that notice, the collector must stop collecting the disputed debt until it obtains verification or a copy of a judgment and mails it to you. Section 809(a)(5) adds that, on a written request within the same thirty days, the collector must give you the name and address of the original creditor if it differs from the current one.

Regulation F, at 12 CFR 1006.34(c)(2), lists what the validation notice must itemize: the itemization date, the amount on that date, the interest, fees, payments and credits since, the current amount, and the creditor’s name. A balance you cannot reconcile against that itemization is a dispute ground at the bureau.

Section 1692g imposes no duty to delete anything from a credit report. A collector that cannot verify may simply stop collecting and leave the tradeline where it is. The unverified debt becomes the basis for a Section 611 dispute with the bureau, which is where deletion happens. The thirty days run from receipt of the written notice, never from a first phone call. Our debt validation letter explainer carries a sample letter.

Debt buyers report under one name and answer to the CFPB under another

A collection often reports under the name of the debt buyer that owns it while its complaints sit under a parent company. In our own read of the CFPB’s public Consumer Complaint Database, over the three years to September 10, 2026, searching “LVNV Funding, LLC”, “Midland Credit Management, Inc.” or “Jefferson Capital Systems, LLC” returns zero complaints; the debt collection complaints recorded in the database over those three years sit under Resurgent Capital Services L.P. (40,094), ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP INC. (34,554) and CL Holdings LLC (36,679). Portfolio Recovery Associates, with 31,616 debt collection complaints recorded over the same three years to September 10, 2026, is the one that files under the name on its own letters.

Name on your report or letterWhere its complaints are recordedDebt collection complaints, three years to September 10, 2026
LVNV Funding, LLCResurgent Capital Services L.P.40,094
Midland Credit Management, Inc.ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP INC.34,554
Jefferson Capital Systems, LLCCL Holdings LLC36,679
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCPortfolio Recovery Associates, LLC31,616

The corporate relationships are public record. What they mean for you is practical: the address a dispute or validation request should reach, and the company whose complaint history you are reading, may not be the one printed on the tradeline.

What those complaints allege lines up with the fields a dispute turns on. Of the 333,590 Debt collection complaints recorded in the CFPB’s public Consumer Complaint Database from July 2025 through June 2026, our read found attempts to collect debt not owed was the leading issue at 41.4%, followed by taking or threatening negative or legal action at 24.2% and written notification about debt at 17.9%. These are unverified consumer allegations: the CFPB does not confirm the facts alleged, a high count tracks company size as well as conduct, and the regulator says its own portal is not a measure of the market.

FCRA Section 605B blocks a collection that came from identity theft within 4 business days

A collection on an account someone else opened in your name comes off through a block, which is faster than a dispute. Under FCRA Section 605B, a bureau must block the information you identify as resulting from identity theft no later than 4 business days after it receives four things: proof of your identity, a copy of an identity theft report, your identification of the information, and your statement that it does not relate to any transaction you made. The identity theft report is filed with the FTC at IdentityTheft.gov.

The block reaches every item you identify as resulting from the theft, which includes the late history on the fraudulent account as well as the collection that followed it. It is not unconditional. Section 605B(c) lets the bureau decline or rescind a block it reasonably finds was made in error, was requested through a material misrepresentation, or covers a transaction from which you obtained goods, services or money. Our guide to the FCRA 605B identity theft block covers the paperwork.

Medical collections: what the bureaus removed in 2022 and 2023, and the federal rule a court vacated

The three bureaus changed medical reporting on their own, in two steps. In a joint announcement on March 18, 2022, Equifax, Experian and TransUnion said paid medical collection debt would no longer be included on credit reports from July 1, 2022, and that the time before unpaid medical collection debt would appear on a report would increase from six months to one year. On April 11, 2023 they announced they had removed medical collection tradelines with an initial balance under $500, bringing the cumulative total to nearly 70% of all medical collection tradelines removed from consumer files.

That makes three dispute grounds that exist only for medical debt: a paid medical collection still reporting, an unpaid one with an initial balance under $500, and one that appeared before its first year had run. They rest on the bureaus’ own published policy rather than on a statute, and the dispute goes to the bureau with your proof of payment or the placement date. The placement date usually has to come from the collector, which is one more use for a validation request.

The federal rule that would have gone further did not survive. The CFPB estimated its January 2025 Regulation V rule would remove about $49 billion in medical debt from roughly 15 million credit reports, but a federal court in the Eastern District of Texas vacated it on July 11, 2025, and the CFPB issued an interpretive rule on October 20, 2025 that the FCRA preempts state bans. Medical debt above the bureaus’ thresholds generally remains reportable today. The CFPB’s July 2022 Consumer Credit Trends analysis shows the limits of the voluntary change as well: 62.6% of medical collection tradelines carried an initial balance under $500, but only 2.5% of medical collection tradelines were ever marked paid. Our guide to medical debt on credit reports goes further.

Pay-for-delete is a written contract the collector is free to refuse

Pay-for-delete is a negotiation in which you offer payment in exchange for the collector deleting the tradeline. No statute requires a collector to agree, and nothing in the FCRA obliges a bureau or furnisher to delete an accurate collection because it was paid. Asking costs you nothing in law. A verbal promise to delete is unenforceable in practice, so the agreement has to be in writing before any money moves.

The steps the recorded answers give are the right ones, in this order:

  1. Contact the collector in writing and offer payment in full or a settled amount in exchange for deletion at every bureau it reports to.
  2. Get the deletion promise in writing, signed, on the collector’s letterhead, before you pay. The CFPB’s guidance on negotiating with a debt collector says to get the plan and the collector’s promises in writing before making any payment.
  3. Pay exactly the agreed amount, by a method that leaves a record.
  4. Pull all three reports after the next reporting cycle and dispute any bureau still showing the tradeline, attaching the agreement.

Our explainer on whether pay-for-delete agreements actually work covers the collector’s side, and the pay-for-delete letter template is ready to adapt.

A settlement with a deletion clause binds the collector, and it has a tax side

When you settle a collection for less than the balance, you can ask for the settlement agreement to include a deletion clause: the collector deletes the tradeline from all three bureaus on receipt of the settlement payment. Like pay-for-delete, the clause is at the collector’s discretion and must be signed before any payment changes hands.

A collector that signs a deletion clause and does not delete is in breach of the agreement. Your options then are a breach-of-contract claim, a complaint to the CFPB, and a Section 611 dispute with the bureaus citing the signed agreement as evidence. Keep the signed copy. Without it, you have no way to prove the collector agreed to delete.

A settlement also carries a tax consequence a payoff does not. The Internal Revenue Service’s Instructions for Forms 1099-A and 1099-C require an applicable entity to file Form 1099-C for each debtor whose cancelled debt of $600 or more involved an identifiable event, so the forgiven part of a settlement can arrive as taxable income the following January. Our guide to taxes on settled debt and Form 1099-C covers the exceptions.

Goodwill letters ask the original creditor for a courtesy no law requires

A goodwill letter asks a creditor to remove accurate negative history as a courtesy after the debt is paid. The recorded answers describe the letter well: pay the account first, explain the hardship that caused the missed payments, show the on-time history since, and ask plainly. Keep expectations modest, because no law requires the creditor to agree.

Goodwill works best on the original creditor’s own late-payment history, the 30-, 60- and 90-day lates that preceded the charge-off, because the original creditor is the party with a customer relationship to weigh. A third-party collector or debt buyer has no such relationship, so the routes for the collection line itself are pay-for-delete, a Section 611 dispute, and the reporting window. Our guide on how to write a goodwill letter includes a sample.

Waiting it out: FCRA Section 605(c)(1) ends the reporting window about 7.5 years after the first missed payment

A collection ages off on its own. FCRA Section 605 allows accounts placed for collection or charged off to be reported for seven years, and Section 605(c)(1) starts that clock 180 days after the delinquency that preceded the collection or charge-off. The reportable life of a collection therefore runs about 7.5 years from the first missed payment that led to it, never from the date a collector bought the account. Paying, settling or reselling the debt does not restart it.

If the collection is close to that date, waiting may be the simplest route, and a collection still reporting after it has run is disputable as obsolete. A handful of states set shorter windows for particular items: FCRA Section 625(b)(1)(E) preserves state reporting laws in effect on September 30, 1996, and New York’s General Business Law Section 380-j(f)(1) bars reporting a paid collection that antedates the report by more than five years.

Re-aged collections violate FCRA Section 623(a)(5), and the original date is your evidence

Re-aging is a collector reporting a later date of first delinquency than the real one, which extends the reporting window. FCRA Section 623(a)(5)(A) requires a furnisher to report, within 90 days, the month and year of the delinquency that immediately preceded the collection or charge-off. A debt buyer may comply by reporting the date the original creditor reported, by using reasonable procedures to obtain it, or, if it cannot be obtained, by reporting a date that precedes the collection action. A debt buyer reporting a fresher date than the original creditor is failing a duty it has.

Dispute a re-aged collection under Section 611 with whatever shows the original delinquency: statements from the original creditor showing the first missed payment, the charge-off notice, or court filings. The bureau must correct the date or delete the tradeline if the collector cannot verify the date it reports. Our guides to debt re-aging and zombie debt cover how resold accounts reappear under new dates.

A state statute of limitations limits lawsuits, and credit reporting runs on its own clock

The CFPB states that most states set a statute of limitations of three to six years for debt, though some are longer, and that the period varies with the type of debt, your state, and the state law named in the credit agreement. After it runs, a collector in most states may still ask for payment but may not sue or threaten to sue. The CFPB adds the warning that matters most here: making a partial payment or acknowledging an old debt, even after the period has expired, may restart it.

A time-barred debt is not removable for that reason alone. It can still report for the full FCRA window, because the reporting clock and the lawsuit clock are independent and run different lengths. Check your state’s period in our statute of limitations on debt by state table before you answer an old collection notice.

What removal or payment changes in each scoring model

Removal takes the tradeline out of every model’s view. Payment without removal depends on which model the next lender pulls, and each vendor publishes only its own treatment:

ModelPaid third-party collectionUnder $100 original amountFirst-party collection
FICO Score 8Read as derogatoryDisregarded (myFICO)Derogatory, no special treatment
FICO Score 9 and FICO 10 suiteDisregarded when paid in full (myFICO)Disregarded (myFICO)Derogatory, no special treatment
VantageScore 3.0 and 4.0All paid collections ignored (VantageScore)Not publishedNot published

myFICO also treats a settled third-party collection reported with a zero balance as paid in FICO Score 9 and the FICO 10 suite. The mortgage market still runs on Classic FICO: the Federal Housing Finance Agency began a limited rollout of VantageScore 4.0 on April 22, 2026 and expanded it to all approved lenders on September 9, 2026, with Classic FICO permitted throughout. No vendor publishes how many points a removal is worth on a given file, because that depends on everything else the file holds. Our comparison of paid and unpaid collections covers the scoring side in full.

Three mistakes that cost the deletion

The first is paying before the deletion is agreed. Payment without a written deletion agreement updates the tradeline to paid, keeps it on the report, and spends the one thing a collector wants in exchange for deleting. Decide which you want before sending money: paid status helps only under FICO Score 9, the FICO 10 suite and VantageScore, and deletion helps under every model.

The second is a partial payment, written acknowledgment or promise to pay on a time-barred debt, which the CFPB warns may restart the statute of limitations and revive the collector’s right to sue. Confirm the period in your state before sending anything that could read as acknowledging the debt.

The third is a dispute with nothing attached. Section 611(a)(3) lets a bureau treat a dispute with no supporting information as frivolous, so the statement, receipt or agreement that proves the error belongs in the envelope.

Where AI dispute tools fall short on a collection dispute

A dispute tool generates letters. Whether a bureau accepts and processes what arrives is a separate question, and a reader should see how that goes wrong. In a 1-star Trustpilot review of Dispute Beast dated September 6, 2026, JCruz wrote: “Credit agencies did not submmit. Most or all agencies replied saying Disputes submited by mail (Sprint) are not going to be applied for reasons like: it was not your person who requested such, if I was using 3rd party it has to be reported”

Section 611 disputes are the consumer’s own, and a bureau can question whether a letter mailed by a third party came from you. A letter you have read, signed and can stand behind is the version that holds up.

Which tool can reach the debt buyer behind a collection that reports under another name

The hard part of a collection dispute is often finding out who you are disputing with. The tradeline may carry a debt buyer’s name, the letters may come from a servicer, and the complaint history may sit under a parent company. The choice between tools turns on whether a tool drafts the dispute for the specific collection, knows the collector behind it, and covers every bureau that reports it.

ToolWhat you payWhat that buys on a collection accountBureausTrustpilot
CreditRefresh$49.99/mo, no setup fee, cancel anytime. Mail letters yourself free, or pay RushMail per letterFlags each collection that looks inaccurate, incomplete, unverifiable or too old to report, drafts a letter citing the FCRA right it stands on, and includes a directory of 25-plus collectors and debt buyers with their aliases and per-collector dispute steps. You review and sign each letterAll three4.3 (9 reviews)
Dispute BeastFrom $49.99/mo for required monitoring. Mail letters yourself free, or pay Sprint Mail per letterAI-generated dispute rounds across the bureaus, an iOS app and FICO 8 scoresAll three4.2 (2,067 reviews)
DisputeBee$49/mo personal, $129/mo businessLetter templates and an item suggester; you import the report, print and mail the letters, and upload the bureau responses yourselfAll three3.2 (68 reviews)
The Credit People$99/mo standard, $119/mo premium, or $599 for 6 monthsDone-for-you challenges, creditor interventions and validations; you do not see or approve the individual lettersAll three1.7 (17 reviews)
Lexington Law$139.95/mo, invoiced at the end of each service periodAttorney-backed challenges handled for you; no self-serve dispute toolAll three3.2 (624 reviews)
Credit KarmaFree, paid for by lender referralsShows the collection and alerts you to changes; its Direct Dispute route files with TransUnionTransUnion1.1 (912 reviews)

Every price is that company’s own published rate, read off that company’s own site on September 15, 2026. Lexington Law publishes its rate on its FAQ page, and DisputeBee on its homepage plan table, rather than on a pricing page. Trustpilot scores and review counts as published on September 24, 2026.

What CreditRefresh does with a collection on your report

Our AI reads all three bureau reports through Refresh Monitoring and flags each collection that looks inaccurate, incomplete, unverifiable, or too old to be reported. For each one you choose to challenge, it drafts a print-ready FCRA dispute letter naming the right the letter stands on, and the collector directory shows which company sits behind a debt buyer’s name. You mail the round yourself or hand it to RushMail for a per-letter fee, and we track each letter against the roughly 30-day investigation window.

The evidence is limited and we state it as measured. In CreditRefresh’s September 18, 2026 member-data extract, 2.3% of disputed bureau-level items in mailed rounds had a recorded outcome. Within that subset, 47.9% were no longer reported on a newer pull of the same bureau, while 52.1% remained reported with a changed balance, status or negative flag. The bureaus decide every dispute, and an accurate collection is not disputable under the FCRA.

It costs $49.99 a month with no setup fee and no contract, and our 100% money-back guarantee is a refund promise, set out on the guarantee page. Every letter is shown to you first, and nothing is mailed until you have reviewed and signed it.

Frequently asked questions

What is the 7 7 7 rule for collections?

It is Regulation F’s call-frequency rule, not a removal rule. Under 12 CFR 1006.14(b)(2), a debt collector is presumed to comply with the harassment ban if it calls you about a particular debt no more than seven times in seven consecutive days and not within seven days after a telephone conversation about that debt, and presumed to violate it if it exceeds either. The presumptions run per debt, and the eighth call is evidence rather than an automatic violation. The seven-year credit reporting window under FCRA Section 605 is a separate rule.

Can you have a 700 credit score with a collection?

A collection does not set a fixed ceiling on a score; the score reflects the whole file. Under FICO Score 9, the FICO 10 suite and VantageScore 3.0 and 4.0, a paid third-party collection is not counted at all, and FICO Scores 8, 9 and 10 disregard third-party collections with an original amount under $100. An unpaid collection is read as derogatory by every model, and no vendor publishes the score range of files that carry one.

How much will my credit score go up if I remove a collection?

No one can say for a given file. FICO and VantageScore publish which collections their models read, never how many points a deletion is worth, because the effect depends on everything else the report holds. A file with other derogatory items still carries them after one collection is deleted.

Is it better to pay off a collection or have it removed?

Removal takes the tradeline out of every model’s view. Payment alone changes the status to paid, which FICO Score 9, the FICO 10 suite and VantageScore disregard and FICO Score 8 and Classic FICO do not. If the debt is yours, ask for deletion in writing as the condition of payment, and pay only once the agreement is signed.

Will my credit score go up if I pay off collections?

It depends on the model the next lender pulls. myFICO states that third-party collections reported as paid in full are disregarded by FICO Score 9 and the FICO 10 suite, and VantageScore states that paid collections are ignored in VantageScore 3.0 and 4.0. FICO Score 8 reads a paid collection as derogatory, and a first-party collection gets no special treatment in any FICO model.

What happens if I never pay off collections?

The collection reports until its window ends, about 7.5 years from the delinquency that produced it under FCRA Section 605(c)(1), and the collector can sue until your state’s statute of limitations runs. Pew’s 2020 study found courts resolved more than 70% of debt collection lawsuits with default judgments in the jurisdictions with available data, and Pew’s 2025 analysis found a judgment can follow a person for at least a decade in 35 states and the District of Columbia. A judgment can lead to wage garnishment, capped for ordinary debt at 25% of disposable earnings under 15 U.S.C. 1673(a).

Can a collection be removed because the collector could not validate it?

Not directly. FDCPA Section 1692g requires the collector to stop collecting until it verifies, and it imposes no duty to delete a credit report entry. The failure to verify becomes your ground for a Section 611 dispute with each bureau, which must delete an item it cannot verify under Section 611(a)(5)(A).

Does a paid medical collection still show on a credit report?

It should not. Equifax, Experian and TransUnion stopped including paid medical collection debt from July 1, 2022, and removed medical collections with an initial balance under $500 in 2023. A paid medical collection still reporting is a dispute ground; send the bureau your proof of payment. Unpaid medical collections above $500 generally remain reportable, because the CFPB rule that would have removed them was vacated on July 11, 2025.

Results may vary. No specific outcome is guaranteed. This article is general information about collection account removal under the FCRA and FDCPA, not legal advice. CreditRefresh helps consumers identify potential FCRA violations and generate dispute letters, but does not provide attorney review of any letter or claim. Consumers facing collection lawsuits, complex multi-party debt chains, or significant FCRA violations should consult a licensed consumer protection attorney.

CreditRefresh finds each collection on your three reports that looks inaccurate, incomplete, unverifiable or too old to report, names the company behind it, and drafts the dispute for you to review and sign. Backed by a 100% money-back guarantee.

Check the collections on your credit report →