FICO and VantageScore are two competing formulas that turn the same credit report into a three-digit number. Both run on a 300 to 850 scale for their general-purpose models, and both read the same bureau data, but they weight that data differently, set different minimum-history rules, treat collections and inquiries differently, and draw their tier lines in different places. FICO scores are used in about 90% of US lending decisions (FICO, 2026). VantageScore is the model the three bureaus own together.

That split is where the trouble starts. The score a borrower watches for months is often one model reading one bureau’s file, and the score a lender pulls can be a different model reading a different file. Neither number is wrong. They were never the same number, and treating them as interchangeable is how an applicant walks into underwriting expecting one figure and meets another.

Underneath both sits a report that may itself be wrong. In the Federal Trade Commission’s congressionally mandated accuracy study, one in five consumers had an error on at least one of their three credit reports, and for 5% the error was serious enough that it could raise the price they pay for credit (Federal Trade Commission, 2013). Every difference below is a difference in how two formulas read a file. An error in the file feeds both.

FICO dates to 1989, and the three bureaus launched VantageScore in 2006

Fair Isaac Corporation, now FICO, introduced its scores to lenders in 1989 (myFICO, 2026). Equifax, Experian and TransUnion each run FICO’s formulas against the file that bureau holds, which is why one person has three FICO scores at any moment: each bureau keeps its own file, so the same model returns a different number at each one (FICO, 2026).

VantageScore launched in 2006. VantageScore Solutions, the company that holds the model’s intellectual property, is an independent joint venture of the three nationwide credit bureaus (VantageScore, 2026). The bureaus built a model they own collectively rather than only licensing one from FICO.

FICOVantageScore
MakerFair Isaac CorporationVantageScore Solutions, owned jointly by Equifax, Experian and TransUnion
First used by lenders19892006
General-purpose range300 to 850300 to 850 since VantageScore 3.0
Versions you may meetFICO 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10 and 10T, plus Auto and Bankcard scoresVantageScore 3.0 and 4.0, with 4plus and 5.0 released after
Published factor weightsFive categoriesSix categories
Rate-shopping window45 days on current versions, 14 on older ones, same loan type only14 days, any hard inquiry
The two scoring families side by side, as each company describes its own models.

Both scales run 300 to 850, and VantageScore adopted that range in 2013

VantageScore 1.0 and 2.0 used a 501 to 990 scale, and with VantageScore 3.0 the bureaus switched it to the 300 to 850 range lenders already knew from FICO (VantageScore, 2025). VantageScore 3.0 arrived in 2013, and VantageScore 4.0 kept the same range.

FICO also sells industry-specific scores on a wider scale. Its Auto Scores and Bankcard Scores run from 250 to 900, against 300 to 850 for the base FICO Score, and they are tuned to predict default on one kind of credit (myFICO, 2026). An auto lender reading a FICO Auto Score can see a number that sits outside the range a consumer app will ever show, from the same underlying report.

VantageScore weights payment history at 41%, against FICO’s 35%

Both companies publish their weights. FICO gives payment history 35%, amounts owed 30%, length of credit history 15%, new credit 10% and credit mix 10%, and says the weights describe the general population and shift with an individual profile (myFICO, 2026). VantageScore publishes six categories for each of its current models (VantageScore, 2025).

FactorFICOVantageScore 3.0VantageScore 4.0
Payment history35%40%41%
Amounts owed / utilization30%20%20%
BalancesInside amounts owed11%6%
Available creditInside amounts owed3%2%
Length of history and credit mix15% plus 10%21%20%
New or recent credit10%5%11%
Weights as each company publishes them. The categories do not map one to one, so compare the direction, not the decimal.

Read the table carefully before drawing conclusions. VantageScore puts more weight on payment history than FICO does. Its utilization line is 20% against FICO’s 30% for amounts owed, but VantageScore scores balances and available credit separately, so its three debt-related lines together reach 28% on 4.0 and 34% on 3.0. The real difference is how the debt picture is sliced. VantageScore 4.0 also moved weight onto recent credit, from 5% to 11%.

The practical effect is that two people with different profiles can see different gaps between their two scores. A file whose weak point is a recent late payment, and a file whose weak point is a high card balance, are marked down by different amounts under each formula. Our breakdown of the five factors behind a FICO Score takes each of FICO’s categories in turn.

A 700 is “Good” to FICO and “Prime” to VantageScore

Each company divides the scale into its own bands, and the labels do not line up. FICO uses five: Poor below 580, Fair 580 to 669, Good 670 to 739, Very Good 740 to 799, and Exceptional 800 and up (myFICO, 2026). VantageScore’s own guide uses four: Subprime 300 to 600, Near prime 601 to 660, Prime 661 to 780, and Superprime 781 to 850 (VantageScore, 2025).

ScoreFICO bandVantageScore tier
590FairSubprime
650FairNear prime
700Good, lower halfPrime, lower half
750Very GoodPrime, upper half
790Very GoodSuperprime
810ExceptionalSuperprime
The same number, labelled by each company’s published bands.

The widest mismatch sits at the top. A 781 is Superprime to VantageScore and still Very Good to FICO, which does not call a score Exceptional until 800. At the bottom, VantageScore’s Subprime tier absorbs everything to 600, while FICO calls 580 to 600 Fair.

The tiers matter because some reports price credit by tier. Experian’s auto finance market report groups borrowers into superprime at 781 and up and deep subprime at 300 to 500, and in the first quarter of 2026 put the average new-car APR at 4.55% for the first group against about 16% for the second (Experian, 2026). VantageScore’s own market data put 19.0% of scored consumers in its subprime tier in December 2025 (VantageScore, 2025). Our guide to credit score ranges walks through what each band means in practice.

FICO needs six months of history, and VantageScore scores thinner files

FICO will not generate a score until the report carries at least one account opened six months or more ago, at least one account reported to the bureau within the past six months, and no deceased indicator (myFICO, 2026). One account can satisfy both conditions at once. A file that fails them comes back with no FICO Score at all.

VantageScore says its models score consumers that rule leaves out, using separate scorecards built for limited credit histories (VantageScore, 2026). That is the reason a young or thin file can show a VantageScore in an app while the FICO field on the same bureau report is empty. The earlier score is real. Whether it counts depends on whether the lender reads VantageScore at all.

The population this touches is not small. The CFPB’s corrected estimate puts 2.7% of adults, about 7.0 million people, as credit invisible in December 2020, with 12.7% of adults in 2010 holding a record too thin or stale to score (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 2025).

Both models count late payments, and FICO publishes the ladder

Payment history is each model’s largest single category. FICO lists the late-payment categories creditors report as 30, 60, 90, 120 and 150 days late and charge-off, says a 90-day late is worse than a 30-day late, and says a recent late payment can do more damage than an older one (myFICO, 2026). There is no reportable category below 30 days.

VantageScore describes the same shape in its own words: the later the payment and the more late payments on the file, the more serious the effect, and the effect fades over time (VantageScore, 2025). Neither company publishes a point cost for a given late payment.

The clock on the entry itself is set by law rather than by either model. Section 605 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act lets most negative items, a late payment among them, be reported for seven years (Fair Credit Reporting Act, Section 605). As the entry ages, both formulas weigh it less, and once it passes that window it should not be on the report for either one to read.

FICO 8 still counts a paid collection, and VantageScore 3.0 and 4.0 do not

Collections are where the two families part most sharply, and where the version matters as much as the brand.

Collection typeFICO 8FICO 9 and the 10 suiteVantageScore 3.0 and 4.0
Original amount under $100IgnoredIgnoredNo published threshold
Paid third-party collectionStill countedIgnoredIgnored
Unpaid medical collectionNo medical distinctionLess negative than other debtExcluded since January 2023
Model treatment as each company publishes it. First-party collections, worked in house by the original lender, get none of FICO’s carve-outs.

FICO disregards collections reported with an original amount under $100 in FICO 8, 9 and the 10 suite, and disregards collections reported as paid in full only in FICO 9 and the 10 suite (myFICO, 2026). So a paid collection that FICO 9 ignores still counts against a FICO 8 score. FICO 9 also treats unpaid medical collections as less negative than other debt (myFICO, 2026). The trended-data change people attach to the newest FICO belongs to FICO 10T specifically, which reads 24 months or more of balance history rather than the latest month (myFICO, 2026).

VantageScore ignores all paid collections in both 3.0 and 4.0, and 3.0 dropped them when it launched in 2013 (VantageScore, 2026). On medical debt, VantageScore removed all medical collections from both 3.0 and 4.0 at the end of January 2023, paid or unpaid, regardless of the amount owed or the age of the collection (VantageScore, 2022), and its current lender and consumer FAQs say the same (VantageScore, 2026). Descriptions of 4.0 that have it ignoring only medical collections under six months old and penalizing older ones less describe the model before that change.

The report itself also changed. The three bureaus removed medical collections with an initial balance under $500, bringing the removed share to nearly 70% of medical collection tradelines, announced April 11, 2023 (Equifax, Experian and TransUnion, 2023). A medical collection above that line can still be reported, and FICO 8 still reads it. Our guide to medical debt on credit reports covers what the bureaus removed and what they kept.

FICO pools same-type loan inquiries for 45 days, and VantageScore pools any inquiry for 14

Both models protect rate shopping, on different terms. On recent FICO versions, several hard inquiries for the same type of loan (mortgage, auto or student) inside 45 days count as one, against 14 days on older versions, and FICO ignores those loan inquiries entirely for the 30 days before scoring (myFICO, 2026). FICO considers inquiries from the last 12 months, and a hard inquiry stays on the report for two years.

VantageScore’s guide says it treats all hard inquiries in a 14-day period as a single inquiry, with no loan type named (VantageScore, 2025). That makes the credit-card carve-out a FICO rule: FICO does not pool card applications, and VantageScore’s guide pools every inquiry type. VantageScore’s separate rate-shopping page describes the window for mortgage and auto lenders only, so the company is not consistent with itself on this point.

FICO publishes two different figures for one inquiry. One myFICO page says one additional inquiry takes less than five points off a FICO Score, and another says hard inquiries lower a score by five to ten points on average (myFICO, 2026). Neither figure is a price a given file will pay. Our guide to soft and hard inquiries covers which pulls count at all.

Which score do lenders actually use?

FICO scores are used in about 90% of US lending decisions, according to FICO (FICO, 2026). FICO names FICO 8 as its most widely used version, and publishes a table of the versions each bureau supplies by purpose: FICO 8 and 9 as the general versions, Auto Score 2, 4, 5, 8 and 9 for auto lending, Bankcard Score 2, 4, 5, 8 and 9 plus FICO Score 3 for card decisions, and FICO 2, 4 and 5 for mortgages (myFICO, 2026).

It is up to each lender to decide which score it uses, and VantageScore says the same from its side: lenders that use scores in underwriting or to manage accounts do not use different scoring models interchangeably (VantageScore, 2026). A lender that has validated its pricing on one model does not read a number from the other.

That leaves the reader with one reliable move. Ask the lender, before applying, which model and which bureau it pulls. A score you track that matches the lender’s model is a preview. One that does not is a direction.

Mortgage lenders pull FICO 2, 4 and 5, and may now use VantageScore 4.0

On a conventional mortgage the lender orders a report from all three bureaus. FICO’s own table pairs FICO 2 with Experian, FICO 5 with Equifax and FICO 4 with TransUnion for mortgage lending (myFICO, 2026). The lender then applies Fannie Mae’s rule: with three scores it uses the middle one, with two the lower, with one that score, and with more than one borrower the lowest of the group (Fannie Mae, Selling Guide B3-5.1-02, April 2026).

Those three versions predate FICO 8. The under-$100 and paid-collection carve-outs above belong to FICO 8, 9 and the 10 suite, so a borrower whose app runs FICO 8 or VantageScore can be tracking a model that ignores entries the mortgage model still reads.

The mortgage picture moved in 2026. The Federal Housing Finance Agency validated FICO 10T and VantageScore 4.0 on October 24, 2022, pushed the implementation date to be determined on January 16, 2025, began a limited VantageScore 4.0 rollout on April 22, 2026, and on September 9, 2026 opened VantageScore 4.0 to all approved lenders (Federal Housing Finance Agency, 2026). Classic FICO remains permitted, and FICO 10T is not yet eligible for delivery. No source publishes how many conventional loans are now scored on each model. Our guide to which credit score mortgage lenders use covers the tri-merge in full.

Why your FICO and VantageScore disagree on the same report

Three things separate the two numbers, and VantageScore lists the same three itself: the bureau supplying the data, the scoring model, and the timing of the pull (VantageScore, 2026).

  1. The model. Different weights, different tiers, and different treatment of paid collections, medical collections and inquiries turn the same entries into different numbers.
  2. The bureau. A VantageScore built on TransUnion data and a FICO 8 built on Experian data are reading two different files, which can differ in accounts, inquiries and the date a furnisher last reported.
  3. The timing. A balance reported on Tuesday is in one pull and missing from a pull made on Monday.

Each company’s national average sits in a different place. FICO put the average US FICO Score at 714 in its fall 2026 report (FICO, 2026), and VantageScore put the average VantageScore 4.0 at 702 in June 2026 (VantageScore, 2026). Those are two populations measured by two companies at two dates, and VantageScore scores thin files FICO leaves blank, so the gap between the averages is no conversion rate for one person.

Reviewers notice the gap when the app number and the lender’s number disagree. Andrew T., 1 star, June 27, 2026, on Credit Karma: “… There scores also show no formal accuracy with the real scores 90% of the time the real score is lower then what they show.” The app was showing a real score. It was showing a different one. Our guide to why credit scores differ between apps and our list of the credit scores you didn’t know you had go through the versions one by one.

An error on the report lowers both scores at once

Every difference above is a difference in how a formula reads a file. Neither formula checks whether the file is right. A late payment reported in error enters FICO’s 35% payment-history category and VantageScore’s 41% one on the same day.

Consumers raise exactly that problem with the regulator more than any other. By our own analysis, 59.4% of the 5,861,954 credit or consumer reporting complaints recorded in the CFPB’s public Consumer Complaint Database from July 2025 through June 2026 were filed under “Incorrect information on your report.” Those are unverified consumer allegations. The CFPB publishes complaints it sent to a company and does not confirm the facts alleged, and it attributes much of the recent volume to credit repair organizations and automated filers, so the count measures filing, not harm.

The readers this matters to most carry lower scores. In CreditRefresh’s September 18, 2026 analysis of paying-member data, members’ VantageScore 3.0 averaged across the bureaus is 597, with a median of 594, and 66.4% average below 620. That is a VantageScore 3.0 reading; the FICO a lender pulls on the same members could land elsewhere.

Which score should you watch before you apply?

Match the score to the decision. The number to track is the one closest to what the lender will pull.

  • A conventional mortgage: FICO 2, 4 and 5 from all three bureaus, or VantageScore 4.0 if the lender says it now orders that model.
  • An auto loan: a FICO Auto Score, since auto lenders read the industry versions FICO publishes for them.
  • A credit card: ask the issuer; FICO lists FICO 8 and 9 and its Bankcard Scores as the versions in card decisions.
  • Routine tracking: either model from a free app works for direction, as long as you keep reading the same model from the same bureau.

The one step that serves every model at once is reading all three reports. A wrong entry fixed at the bureau is removed from the data every formula scores, which no amount of switching between score versions can do.

Choosing a tool when the score you watch is not the score a lender pulls

The two models disagree about weights. They agree on the file. So the tool question for this reader is which one lets you see and act on all three bureau files both scores are built from, rather than which one shows the nicer number.

ToolWhat you payWhat that buys when your two scores disagreeBureausTrustpilot
CreditRefresh$49.99/mo, no setup fee, cancel anytime. Mail letters yourself free, or pay RushMail per letterReads all three bureau files both models score and drafts a letter for each entry you choose to dispute; you review and sign each oneAll three4.3 (9 reviews)
Dispute BeastFrom $49.99/mo for required monitoring. Mail letters yourself free, or pay Sprint Mail per letterThree-bureau reports with Vantage and FICO scores, plus a free dispute toolAll three4.2 (2,067 reviews)
DisputeBee$49/mo personal, $129/mo businessLetter templates and a suggester; you import the report, print, mail and log every replyAll three3.2 (68 reviews)
The Credit People$99/mo standard, $119/mo premium, or $599 for 6 monthsBefore-and-after scores on all three and unlimited challenges run for you; you never see the lettersAll three1.7 (17 reviews)
Lexington Law$139.95/mo, invoiced at the end of each service periodA law firm works your case; there is no self-serve toolAll three3.2 (624 reviews)
Credit KarmaFree, paid for by lender referralsFree scores and alerts; its dispute path reaches one bureau and drafts nothingTransUnion1.1 (912 reviews)

Every price is that company’s own published rate, read off that company’s own site on September 15, 2026. Trustpilot scores and review counts as published on September 24, 2026.

Bureau reach decides whether a tool touches the file a lender reads. A mortgage lender reads all three, so a tool whose dispute path reaches TransUnion alone leaves the Experian file behind FICO 2 and the Equifax file behind FICO 5 untouched.

Check the entries both models read with CreditRefresh

When two scores disagree, the useful question is what they are both reading. CreditRefresh scans your Equifax, Experian and TransUnion reports, flags items that look inaccurate, incomplete, unverifiable or too old to report, and drafts an FCRA letter for each item you choose to challenge. Bureaus generally have about 30 days to investigate a dispute.

Monitoring then shows what the newer reports say. In CreditRefresh’s September 18, 2026 member-data extract, 2.3% of disputed bureau-level items in mailed rounds had a recorded outcome. Within that subset, 47.9% were no longer reported on a newer pull of the same bureau, while 52.1% remained reported with a changed balance, status or negative flag.

CreditRefresh is included with Refresh Monitoring for $49.99 a month, with no setup fee, no charge per dispute and no contract, and you can cancel any time. You review and sign every letter before it goes out, then mail it yourself or send the round through RushMail for a per-letter fee.

It is backed by our 100% money-back guarantee: members who work the full program and see no bureau score rise above where they started can claim back every Refresh Monitoring payment. It is a refund promise, never a score promise.

Frequently asked questions

Which is more important, VantageScore or FICO score?

The one your lender pulls. FICO scores are used in about 90% of US lending decisions (FICO, 2026), and conventional mortgages have run on FICO 2, 4 and 5, with VantageScore 4.0 open to all approved lenders since September 9, 2026. For tracking direction between applications, either works.

Do lenders prefer FICO or VantageScore?

Most lending runs on FICO, by FICO’s own count, and each lender picks its model. VantageScore says lenders do not use different scoring models interchangeably, so a lender reads the one it has validated, and the only way to know which is to ask.

If my VantageScore is 700, what is my FICO score?

There is no formula that converts one into the other. The two models weight the same data differently, and your two scores may come from different bureaus, so a 700 VantageScore sits alongside a FICO that can be higher or lower. A 700 is Prime to VantageScore and Good to FICO.

How close is VantageScore 3.0 to a FICO score?

They share the scale and most inputs. VantageScore 3.0 weights payment history at 40% against FICO’s 35%, and utilization at 20% plus 11% for balances and 3% for available credit against FICO’s 30% for amounts owed (VantageScore, 2025). It ignores paid collections, which FICO 8 still counts.

Why is my VantageScore lower than my FICO score?

The two scores may read different bureau files, weigh your weakest factor differently, or come from pulls on different dates. VantageScore puts 41% on payment history against FICO’s 35%, while FICO 8 still counts a paid collection that VantageScore ignores. The gap can run the other way just as easily.

Is FICO your true credit score?

You have many true scores. Each model run on each bureau’s file at a given moment produces a valid number, and FICO alone publishes versions from FICO 2 through FICO 10T. The score that decides an application is whichever model and bureau that lender reads.

Does VantageScore count medical collections?

No, on its current models. Since the end of January 2023, VantageScore 3.0 and 4.0 exclude every medical collection, paid or unpaid, whatever the amount or age (VantageScore, 2022). Earlier descriptions of 4.0 that count unpaid medical collections older than six months predate that change. FICO 8 still counts an unpaid medical collection, and FICO 9 treats one as less negative than other debt.

CreditRefresh reads the Equifax, Experian and TransUnion files that every FICO and VantageScore version is built from, and drafts the challenge to whatever on them is wrong. Backed by a 100% money-back guarantee.

Check the reports behind both of your scores →