The bureau didn't respond within 30 days. Now what?
Under FCRA Section 611, a bureau that can't complete its investigation within the deadline (30 days, extendable to 45 if you add new information mid-dispute) must delete the disputed information. If the window passes with no response, allow for mail time, confirm the dates, and then escalate: the dispute record CreditRefresh keeps is your evidence, and a CFPB complaint is the standard next step.
What the law actually requires
FCRA Section 611 gives a bureau 30 days from receiving your dispute to complete its investigation. The window can stretch to 45 days if you submit additional relevant information during the investigation. Information that can't be verified within the deadline has to be deleted or corrected. A blown deadline is not a technicality; it triggers a real obligation.
First, confirm the window really passed
- The clock starts when the bureau receives the letter, not when it was mailed. Add mail time on the front end.
- The response also arrives by mail in many cases. Add mail time on the back end before concluding there was no answer.
- Check whether anything was added to the dispute mid-investigation, which can extend the window to 45 days.
In practice, that means waiting roughly five and a half to six weeks from mailing before treating a dispute as unanswered. CreditRefresh tracks each dispute's window, so your dashboard shows where each one stands.
Escalating a blown deadline
If the deadline has genuinely passed with no response, file a complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau at consumerfinance.gov. Bureaus are required to respond to CFPB complaints, and a documented timeline is exactly the kind of complaint that gets attention. Your CreditRefresh dispute record (what was disputed, when it was mailed, what came back and when) is the evidence you attach.
If the item is still on the report
An unverified item that survives the deadline is disputable again, this time with the added fact that the bureau failed to meet its statutory window. A Method of Verification request is another pressure point: it forces the bureau to explain how it verified an item, which is hard to answer for an investigation it never completed.
Related articles
Section 611 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act is the federal law that gives you the right to dispute inaccurate or incomplete information on your credit reports and requires the credit bureaus to investigate. Bureaus have 30 days from receipt to investigate, contact the data furnisher, and notify you of the outcome. If they can't verify the disputed information, they have to delete or correct it.
When the standard dispute process has failed: a bureau missed the FCRA 30-day deadline, returned a clearly inadequate investigation, refused to investigate, or a furnisher keeps re-reporting a corrected item. The CFPB is an escalation tool — file at consumerfinance.gov/complaint after normal disputes haven't worked.
A Method of Verification request, or MOV, is a follow-up letter sent to a credit bureau after a dispute comes back verified. It uses your right under FCRA Section 611(a)(7) to ask the bureau exactly how the verification was performed — who they contacted, what was reviewed, what procedures were used. If the bureau can't show a real investigation, the verified item often gets removed.
If a dispute comes back "verified," the item stays on your report — but that's rarely the end. Your next moves: request the bureau's Method of Verification to see how they checked, dispute directly with the furnisher, re-dispute with new or more specific evidence, or file a complaint with the CFPB. A "verified" result often means a thin automated check, not a confirmed-accurate item.